<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><article><front><Journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type='publisher'>CWE/884/2017</journal-id><journal-title >Current World Environment</journal-title><issn pub-type='PPub'>0973-4929</issn><issn pub-type='ePub'>2320-8031</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Enviro Research Publishers</publisher-name></publisher></Journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type='other'>CWE--36-00</article-id><title-group><article-title>Structure and Diversity of Sal Forests in Government and Community Management Systems in kumaun Region of Central Himalaya</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type='author'><name><surname></surname><given-names></given-names></name><xref ref-type='aff' rid='aff00'><sup></sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type='author'><name><surname></surname><given-names></given-names></name><xref ref-type='aff' rid='aff00'><sup></sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type='author'><name><surname></surname><given-names></given-names></name><xref ref-type='aff' rid='aff00'><sup></sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type='author'><name><surname></surname><given-names></given-names></name><xref ref-type='aff' rid='aff00'><sup></sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type='ppub'><publicationDate>2016-04-30</publicationDate></pub-date><doi>10.12944/CWE.11.1.16</doi><volume>Volume 11</volume><issue>Volume 11</issue><page>126-132</page><abstract><title>Abstract</title><p>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:14px&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif&quot;&gt;The present study deals with structure, diversity and regeneration of Sal (&lt;em&gt;Shorearobusta&lt;/em&gt;Gaertn.) forests in Kumaun region of Central Himalaya. Twoforest types were investigated i.e. Sal dominant forestandSal teak (&lt;em&gt;Tectonagrandis&lt;/em&gt; Linn.) mixed forestin KumaunHimalaya.Tree, sapling and seedling density was 650- 911, 36-1303 and 400-6656 ind.ha&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, respectively. Salshowed reverse J-shaped curve representing good regeneration and &lt;em&gt;T. grandis&lt;/em&gt;showed reverse bell shaped indicating fair regeneration in community management system while Sal showed poor regeneration in the government management forest. Sal showed comparatively good regeneration in Sal mixed forest in community managed while poor regeneration in Sal dominantgovernment management system. Over exploitation Sal species for basic needs of people consequentlyimpart the negative impact on regeneration of forest. Thus it is suggested that mixed forests with higher number of species reduces the pressure on individual ones species as can be brought by local people so should be managed and conserved sustainably.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</p></abstract><kwd-group><title>Keywords</title><kwd>Shorearobusta</kwd><kwd> Tectonagrandis</kwd><kwd> density</kwd><kwd> Species diversity</kwd><kwd> Regeneration</kwd><kwd> Van panchayat</kwd></kwd-group><counts><ref-count count='' /><page-count count='' /></counts></article-meta></front></article>