Current World Environment

Introduction

Tourism ranks among the world's fastest-growing industries, witnessing a surge in both local and international travel. Yet, it's imperative to recognize its role in environmental degradation, cultural erosion, and social inequality^1-2. This has propelled the rise of sustainable tourism, seeking eco-friendly, socially conscious, and economically viable travel^3-4. Ecotourism has emerged as a variant, advocating responsible exploration of natural areas to conserve the environment and uplift local communities' well-being ⁵. The International Ecotourism Society's widely accepted definition characterizes ecotourism as "responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment, sustains the well-being of local people, and involves interpretation and education," ^6-7. This embodies sustainability's core, meeting current needs while preserving resources for future generations, as sourced from 8. Ecotourism primarily aims to mitigate tourism's environmental impact, conserve natural resources, and enhance locals' welfare. Moreover, ecotourism serves as a conduit for sustainable development, fostering conservation, revenue generation, and rural employment^6-98.

The potential of ecotourism as a tool for sustainable development has been widely recognized by governments, international organizations, and NGOs. The United Nations has acknowledged the potential of ecotourism as a means of fostering sustainable development and officially designated the year 2002 as the International Year of Ecotourism⁹. The World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) has also recognized the potential of ecotourism and has developed guidelines for sustainable tourism development that include ecotourism as a key component¹⁰. Ecotourism has been shown to have a positive impact on the environment. Thus it promotes the conservation of natural resources by creating a market for eco-friendly products and services^{11-12,103,111,113,115}. It also promotes environmental education and awareness by providing opportunities for tourists to learn about the natural environment and the need for conservation^{13-14,101-102}. Ecotourism also encourages the preservation of cultural and historical sites by creating a demand for these sites.

Furthermore, ecotourism has also been shown to have a positive impact on the local economy. Ecotourism generates income for local communities through the provision of tourism-related products and services^15-16,98. It creates employment opportunities in rural areas, which helps to reduce rural-urban migration ¹⁷. It encourages the growth of small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs) capable of providing products and services to the tourism sector.

The development of ecotourism as a tool for sustainable development faces challenges and limitations. One key challenge is the lack of understanding and awareness of ecotourism among both tourists and local communities^{18-19,100-101}. Many tourists are unaware of the environmental and social impact of their travel, while local communities may be resistant to ecotourism due to a lack of awareness or concerns about the impact on their traditional way of life^20-21. Another challenge is the inadequate planning and management of ecotourism projects, which are crucial for ensuring sustainability and avoiding negative impacts on the environment and local communities^22-23,100. Community participation is also important for equitable benefit sharing and cultural appropriateness of ecotourism projects^24,100.

This study focused on the impacts of ecotourism on sustainable development and strategies to mitigate its negative impacts. Specifically, the study examined the environmental, economic, and social impacts of ecotourism and analyzed case studies of successful ecotourism projects in different parts of the world. The study also explored strategies to mitigate the negative impacts of ecotourism, including careful planning and management, community involvement, and environmental education^101-102.

Although there is a significant body of literature on eco-tourism, there is still a gap in the research on the effectiveness of strategies to mitigate its negative impacts on sustainable development. While many studies have highlighted ecotourism's potential drawbacks, few have delved into effective mitigation strategies. This study addresses this gap by analyzing successful ecotourism cases and proposing methods to counteract its negative impacts. Additionally, there is a need for further research on the economic impacts of ecotourism and how they can be maximized to promote sustainable development. Future research could also explore the potential of ecotourism to promote cultural preservation and biodiversity conservation^{98-99,102,103}.

Literature Review

Ecotourism has gained recognition as a potential tool for sustainable development, with numerous studies examining its environmental, economic, and social impacts. The literature indicates that ecotourism has positive environmental effects by promoting the conservation of natural resources^25-26. Through creating a market for eco-friendly products and services, ecotourism provides financial incentives for the preservation of natural resources, encouraging the adoption of sustainable land use practices¹⁴. Additionally, ecotourism fosters environmental education and awareness among tourists through interpretive services, such as guided nature walks and lectures on conservation²⁷.

In terms of economic impacts, ecotourism generates income for local communities by providing tourism-related products and services and creates employment opportunities in rural areas, thereby reducing rural-urban migration^28-29. It also promotes the development of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that can supply goods and services to the tourism industry, diversifying rural economies and supporting local businesses^30-31. Ecotourism has been recognized as a catalyst for rural economic development, creating new income-generating opportunities and markets for local products and services³².

Furthermore, ecotourism generates favorable social outcomes through the stimulation of community participation and empowerment. Frequently, local populations are actively involved in the formulation, advancement, and oversight of ecotourism endeavors, culminating in heightened community ownership and augmented authority in decision-making processes ^33-34. This can contribute to improved social cohesion, cultural preservation, and the protection of traditional knowledge and practices³⁵. It has also been shown to foster cross-cultural exchange and understanding between tourists and local communities, enhancing mutual respect and appreciation.

Nevertheless, it's crucial to acknowledge that the beneficial effects of ecotourism are not assured and hinge on diverse elements, including proficient strategizing, adept administration, and robust community engagement. There are also potential negative impacts, such as increased environmental degradation, cultural commodification, and social disruptions^36-37. Therefore, careful planning, regulation, and monitoring are crucial to ensure that ecotourism contributes to sustainable development goals. Overall, the literature suggests that when properly managed, ecotourism can be a promising tool for promoting conservation, generating income, and creating employment opportunities in rural areas, contributing to sustainable development efforts.

Moreover, ecotourism has also been found to have positive impacts on local communities. Ecotourism fosters cultural exchange and intercultural understanding by providing opportunities for tourists to interact with local communities^38-39. Additionally, ecotourism contributes to the economic well-being of local communities by creating employment and income-generating opportunities⁴⁰. Suggests that ecotourism can promote intercultural understanding and cultural exchange by allowing tourists to experience local customs, traditions, and ways of life. Additionally, ecotourism enables tourists to understand local communities' challenges including poverty, social inequality, and environmental degradation⁴¹. By facilitating cultural exchange and learning, ecotourism promotes intercultural understanding, tolerance, and the breakdown of cultural barriers.

However, it is important to acknowledge that ecotourism, while often promoted as a sustainable form of tourism that benefits local communities and the environment, also has negative impacts across the environmental, economic, and social dimensions. For instance, the overexploitation of natural resources for tourism purposes and increased traffic and pollution resulting from the development of tourism infrastructure can lead to environmental degradation and depletion of resources that are crucial for the local economy^42-43. Damage to wildlife habitats and ecosystems due to tourism activities can have detrimental effects on both the environment and the local communities that rely on these resources for their livelihoods^29,99. Displacement of local communities from their homes and lands due to the development of ecotourism infrastructure can negatively impact both the environment and the social fabric of the community⁴⁴. Unequal distribution of benefits among local communities and exploitation of local cultures and traditions for tourism purposes can also result in economic and social inequality, loss of cultural authenticity, and potential conflicts within the community⁴⁵.

It's crucial to emphasize that the adverse effects of ecotourism are context-dependent and can be mitigated through diligent planning and management⁴⁶. However, it is crucial to consider and address these negative impacts to ensure that ecotourism genuinely supports sustainable development and benefits all stakeholders involved⁴⁷. Therefore, ecotourism planning and management should prioritize the integration of environmental, economic, and social sustainability goals to ensure a balanced approach that addresses potential negative impacts across all dimensions of sustainability. The current review article envisages on how ecotourism contributes to sustainable development, including environmental, economic, and social dimensions; and what are the potential negative environmental, economic and social impacts and how can they be mitigated through careful planning and management.

Research Methodology

This research study employed a comprehensive mixed-method methodology, encompassing an extensive literature review and examination of case studies pertaining to thriving ecotourism ventures across diverse global regions. The overarching aim was to analyze the multifaceted environmental, economic, and social facets of ecotourism and its role in advancing sustainable development objectives. In the analysis of the environmental dimension, an exhaustive review of scholarly articles, academic texts, and reports was conducted, delving into the ecological repercussions of ecotourism. This phase concentrated on identifying pivotal concepts such as biodiversity preservation, carbon footprint mitigation, and the adoption of sustainable land usage methodologies. Additionally, case studies of successful ecotourism projects were scrutinized to ascertain the degree to which these initiatives effectively implemented environmentally sound practices. 

For the exploration of the economic dimension, a thorough review of scholarly literature encompassing articles, texts, and reports was undertaken, aiming to unveil the economic benefits engendered by ecotourism for local communities and broader economies. The inquiry was focused on discerning salient ideas such as economic diversification, employment generation, and ecotourism's contribution to Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Notably, case studies of prosperous ecotourism projects were also analyzed to gauge the economic advantages they yielded. 

The scrutiny of the social dimension involved an in-depth examination of scholarly articles, academic texts, and reports investigating the sociocultural ramifications of ecotourism on indigenous communities. Emphasis was placed on identifying pivotal concepts such as community empowerment, cultural heritage preservation, and social inclusivity. Moreover, case studies of successful ecotourism initiatives were subjected to analysis to ascertain their contributions to the well-being and sociocultural development of local communities. The selection of these successful ecotourism projects was predicated on their demonstrated proficiency in achieving a harmonious amalgamation of environmental, economic, and social sustainability paradigms. A mixed-method approach, encompassing both qualitative and quantitative data collection methodologies, was adopted to comprehensively analyze the selected case studies. In culmination, this research aimed to provide nuanced insights into the diverse contexts through which ecotourism can effectively foster sustainable development. By integrating an all-encompassing literature review with meticulous case study analyses, this study yielded a comprehensive and distinctive understanding of the intricate interplay between the environmental, economic, and social dimensions of ecotourism.

Results

Ecotourism impacts sustainable development

Ecotourism assumes a pivotal role in the promotion of sustainable development, effecting substantial contributions through the preservation of natural resources, stimulation of local economies, and preservation of cultural heritage. The International Ecotourism Society delineates it as a form of conscientious travel to pristine environments, underscoring environmental conservation, community welfare, and educational facets⁴⁸.

Environmental Impact

Ecotourism has the potential to significantly contribute to environmental conservation by promoting sustainable land use practices, such as the protection of natural habitats, reduction of carbon emissions, and preservation of biodiversity. Various research findings indicate that ecotourism can effectively generate revenue for conservation efforts, including wildlife and habitat protection^49-50. There is a growing body of research on the environmental impacts of ecotourism. While ecotourism can be a tool for promoting environmental conservation, it also has negative impacts if not properly managed. One study conducted in Costa Rica found that ecotourism activities, such as hiking and wildlife viewing, can lead to habitat degradation and disturbance of wildlife if not properly managed⁵¹. Additionally, the construction of ecotourism infrastructure, such as lodges and trails, can have negative impacts on natural ecosystems if not designed and built with sustainability in mind⁴⁷. However, other studies have shown that ecotourism can be effective in reducing environmental impacts compared to traditional tourism activities. For example, a study conducted in Brazil found that ecotourism activities had lower carbon emissions than traditional tourism activities due to the use of more sustainable transportation and accommodations⁵². The environmental effects of ecotourism are intricate and influenced by factors such as tourism activities, infrastructure, and natural sensitivity. Maximizing its benefits involves prioritizing sustainable land use, habitat conservation, and reducing carbon emissions through eco-friendly transportation and accommodations⁵³.

Economic Impact

Ecotourism can also contribute to sustainable economic development by creating employment opportunities, promoting economic diversification, and supporting local entrepreneurship. Studies have shown that ecotourism can be a significant contributor to GDP, particularly in developing countries⁵⁴. For example, in Costa Rica, ecotourism has become a major source of foreign exchange, contributing to over 10% of the country's GDP⁵⁵. 

Moreover, ecotourism has significant economic impacts on local communities and economies. It has the potential to create employment opportunities, generate income, and contribute to local economic development⁵⁶. For instance, a study conducted in Kenya found that ecotourism had substantial economic benefits for local communities, including increased income and job creation⁵⁷. Another study conducted in the Amazon region of Brazil revealed that ecotourism generated higher revenue per hectare of land compared to cattle ranching, indicating its potential as a profitable and sustainable land-use option⁵⁸. However, it should be noted that the economic benefits of ecotourism may not be evenly distributed, with certain communities benefiting more than others. For example, research conducted in Costa Rica demonstrated that the economic benefits of ecotourism were concentrated in a limited number of affluent communities, while economically disadvantaged communities received less benefit⁵⁹. The economic effects of ecotourism are influenced by factors like activity scale, community engagement, and infrastructure. Optimizing benefits involves involving local communities in planning, ensuring fair economic distribution, and investing in necessary infrastructure^60-61.

Social Impact

Ecotourism highlights the potential for supporting social sustainability by promoting cultural preservation, facilitating social inclusion, and empowering local communities⁶². Tourists can learn about local cultures, traditions, and customs, leading to cultural preservation⁶³. It also creates employment opportunities for marginalized groups such as women and indigenous peoples, promoting social inclusion⁶⁴. Furthermore, local communities can gain greater control over their resources and livelihoods through ecotourism, leading to increased self-determination and empowerment⁶⁵. In conclusion, ecotourism offers substantial potential for sustainable development through environmental conservation, economic growth, and social well-being. However, realizing these gains mandates meticulous planning, stakeholder engagement, and a commitment to prioritizing sustainability⁶⁶.

The social implications of ecotourism entail a dual spectrum of positive and negative outcomes. On the positive side, ecotourism exhibits the capacity to facilitate cultural preservation, enhance intercultural comprehension, and offer platforms for local community members to exchange their indigenous knowledge and traditions with visiting individuals⁴⁰. Furthermore, ecotourism can enhance a sense of pride and identity in local communities, foster community cohesion, and build social capital⁶⁷. However, on the negative side, ecotourism can also cause social conflicts and tensions, particularly if local communities feel excluded from decision-making processes or if benefits are not distributed equitably⁶⁸. Moreover, ecotourism can sometimes result in cultural commodification, where local cultures are reduced to simplistic images and practices that are packaged and sold to tourists, perpetuating stereotypes. Research has shown that community involvement in ecotourism planning and development is crucial for maximizing positive social impacts and minimizing negative impacts⁶⁹. For instance, a study conducted in Madagascar showed that positive social impacts were achieved through ecotourism development when local communities were actively involved in decision-making and received direct economic benefits⁷⁰. In summary, the social impacts of ecotourism are multifaceted and dependent on factors such as community involvement, types of ecotourism activities, and emphasis on cultural preservation and exchange in programming. To maximize positive social impacts and minimize negative impacts, community involvement, cultural exchange, and understanding should be prioritized, and equitable distribution of economic benefits should be ensured. Table 1 provides a summary of the positive and negative impacts of ecotourism on the environment, economy, and society.

Table 1: Positive and negative impacts of ecotourism.   Click here to view Table

Planning and management

The negative impacts of ecotourism can be mitigated through careful planning and management, incorporating sustainable practices that prioritize the protection of the environment, economy, and society. Some possible strategies for mitigating the negative impacts are:

Figure 1: Steps to mitigate the negative impacts of ecotourism   Click here to view Figure

Environmental impact mitigation

In ecotourism, it is important to minimize negative impacts on nature and the environment. There are several ways we can do this. First, limit the number of visitors to a level that the ecosystem can handle without getting damaged. For example, in the Galapagos Islands, they have strict rules on how many tourists can visit certain areas and how they should behave to protect the delicate ecosystem⁷¹. Similarly, in Kenya's Masai Mara National Reserve, the Maasai people practice rotational grazing to prevent the overuse of the grasslands⁷². Another important strategy is reducing waste. Ecotourism operators should use sustainable waste management practices like reducing, reusing, and recycling waste generated by tourists⁷³. For example, some eco-lodges in Costa Rica have a zero-waste policy where all waste is either recycled or composted⁷⁴. Using renewable energy sources is also a good way to mitigate environmental impacts. Ecotourism operators can use solar, wind, or hydroelectric power instead of relying on non-renewable energy sources. For instance, the Shangri-La Hotel in Sydney, Australia, has installed a solar energy system to reduce its carbon footprint and dependence on non-renewable energy⁷⁵. Lastly, it is important to limit the number of visitors in sensitive ecosystems. Ecotourism operators should make sure that tourist activities do not harm fragile ecosystems like coral reefs or wetlands. For example, in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park in Australia, strict guidelines are in place for visitor behavior, including restrictions on touching or standing on the coral⁷⁶. In summary, minimizing environmental impacts is crucial in ecotourism. Strategies such as limiting visitor numbers, reducing waste, using renewable energy, and protecting sensitive ecosystems have been successful in mitigating negative impacts. These strategies secure ecotourism's sustainability, mutually benefiting tourists and local communities, while safeguarding natural resources and cultural heritage for future generations.

Economic impact mitigation

Mitigating the economic impacts is an important aspect of ecotourism development to ensure that local communities benefit from tourism and prevent economic leakage. Strategies such as involving local communities in planning and managing tourism activities, purchasing goods and services from local suppliers, and providing capacity-building programs have been successful in mitigating the negative economic impacts of ecotourism. For example, in Thailand, the community of Ban Talae Nok has developed a successful ecotourism project where local people are involved in the management of a mangrove forest and provide tourism services like homestays and guided tours. This ensures that economic benefits are distributed equitably among local communities⁷⁷. Similarly, in Costa Rica, the government has implemented policies to promote local procurement in the tourism industry, supporting local businesses and increasing economic benefits for local communities⁷⁸. Moreover, capacity-building programs, such as vocational training and entrepreneurship development, have been implemented in Kenya by the International Labour Organization (ILO) to help local communities gain the skills and knowledge needed to participate in the tourism industry and improve their economic opportunities⁷⁹. In conclusion, community-based tourism, local procurement policies, and capacity building for local communities are successful strategies for mitigating the negative economic impacts of ecotourism. These strategies ensure ecotourism's sustainable growth, benefiting local economies while preserving natural resources and cultural heritage for the future.

Social impact mitigation

It is important to make sure that local communities and their cultural heritage are protected and that social conflicts are avoided in ecotourism development. Strategies like involving local communities, providing cultural sensitivity training for ecotourism operators, and promoting cultural events have been successful in reducing the negative social impacts of ecotourism. Getting local communities involved in ecotourism development is crucial. Incorporating them into the planning, development, and management of tourism activities is essential to guarantee that the tourism experience upholds their customs and traditions. For example, in Peru, the community of Ccaccaccollo has a successful ecotourism project where locals participate in managing a community-run tourism center offering cultural tours, handicraft workshops, and homestays for tourists⁸⁰. Ecotourism operators should also receive cultural sensitivity training to understand and respect local customs and traditions. This helps prevent social conflicts and ensures that the tourism product is culturally appropriate. For instance, in Mexico, the government has a program that provides cultural sensitivity training to tour operators, resulting in improved quality of the tourism product and reduced social conflicts⁸¹. Promoting cultural events and activities is another effective strategy. Ecotourism operators should actively promote local customs and traditions through cultural events and activities. This helps preserve cultural heritage and brings economic benefits to local communities. For example, in Indonesia, the government has a program to promote cultural tourism, resulting in increased economic benefits for local communities and the preservation of cultural heritage⁸². In conclusion, mitigating social impacts is crucial in ecotourism development to protect local communities and their cultural heritage and avoid social conflicts. Involving local communities, providing cultural sensitivity training, and promoting cultural events are successful strategies for mitigating the negative social impacts of ecotourism. These strategies ensure sustainable ecotourism development that provides long-term social benefits to local communities while preserving cultural heritage for future generations.

Monitoring and evaluation

In the development of ecotourism, monitoring, and evaluation (M&E) play a vital role in ensuring that sustainability goals are achieved and identifying areas for improvement. Ecotourism operators should collect data on environmental, economic, and social impacts to evaluate the effectiveness of management practices and tourism policies⁸³. Environmental monitoring is crucial to prevent negative impacts on natural resources and ecosystems⁸⁴. Data on waste generation, energy consumption, water use, and greenhouse gas emissions can identify areas for improvement in tourism operations, such as implementing sustainable energy solutions, reducing water use, and minimizing waste generation⁸⁵. Economic monitoring is essential to ensure that tourism activities generate economic benefits for local communities and contribute to sustainable development⁸⁶. Data on employment generation, income distribution, and the contribution of tourism to local economies can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of tourism policies and identify opportunities to enhance the economic benefits of ecotourism⁸⁷. Similarly, social monitoring is crucial to ensure that tourism activities are socially responsible and respectful of local customs and traditions. Data on cultural heritage preservation, community involvement, and the promotion of local products and services can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies to mitigate social impacts and identify opportunities to enhance the social benefits of ecotourism⁸⁸. In conclusion, monitoring and evaluation are critical components of ecotourism development to achieve sustainability goals and identify areas for improvement. Environmental, economic, and social monitoring activities are essential to evaluate the impacts of tourism activities and identify opportunities to enhance the sustainability of ecotourism. The collection of data on environmental, economic, and social impacts can inform tourism policies and management practices, ensuring that ecotourism development is sustainable and provides long-term benefits to local communities.

Discussion

The findings from this study underscore the dual nature of ecotourism's effects on the environment, economy, and society. While offering substantial advantages for local communities and sustainable development, ecotourism is also associated with adverse consequences, including environmental degradation, societal upheaval, and economic leakage. The analysis of environmental impacts revealed a range of detrimental outcomes linked to ecotourism activities, encompassing soil erosion, deforestation, and a decline in biodiversity. However, these negative effects can be mitigated through meticulous planning and adept management strategies. Such strategies include the adoption of sustainable practices and the incorporation of environmentally friendly technologies. For example, Costa Rican ecotourism operators have effectively embraced sustainable energy solutions and waste management techniques, effectively minimizing their environmental footprint. Similarly, the Galapagos Islands exercise meticulous oversight and management of ecotourism endeavors to safeguard the delicate ecosystem from harm⁷¹.

Examining economic ramifications, ecotourism emerges as a catalyst for local economic advancement, stimulating job creation, income generation, and the propagation of local goods and services. Yet, the specter of economic leakage looms if tourism earnings fail to be reinvested within the local community. To preclude this, collaboration between ecotourism entities and local communities can birth sustainable tourism offerings that bolster indigenous culture and customs. Illustratively, Kenya's administration has initiated a program involving local communities in ecotourism initiatives, fostering augmented economic prospects and community development⁷⁹. Evaluating social consequences, ecotourism emerges as a harbinger of positive outcomes, such as the safeguarding of cultural heritage and the engagement of local communities. However, the potential for social upheaval exists if tourism activities disregard local traditions and norms. To counteract this, ecotourism stakeholders can engage in co-development with local communities to architect culturally sensitive tourism services and products. For instance, Tanzania's government has instituted a program encouraging community participation in ecotourism, consequently boosting local cultural events and practices⁸⁹.

In summation, this study underscores ecotourism's significant influence on the environment, economy, and society. Although these impacts straddle both positive and negative realms, meticulous planning and astute management hold the potential to ameliorate adverse repercussions while amplifying positive outcomes. By incorporating sustainable methodologies and enlisting local communities in ecotourism initiatives, a symbiotic relationship can be nurtured, enabling ecotourism to function as an instrument of sustainable development, ultimately bequeathing enduring advantages to local populations.

Implications

This study findings provide crucial implications for global ecotourism development and management. It stresses meticulous planning to mitigate adverse environmental, economic, and societal effects³⁶. The provided impact assessment tool, Table 1, serves as a practical aid for identifying and addressing potential impacts. Additionally, the study highlights the significance of involving local communities to ensure effective ecotourism projects. The favorable effects of ecotourism on the local community, including job prospects and income generation, endure through active community engagement in the planning and administration of ecotourism endeavors^90-91. Moreover, community involvement can promote cultural preservation and enhance the authenticity of the ecotourism experience. Thirdly, the study highlights the potential of ecotourism to promote sustainable development through environmental education and conservation awareness. Ecotourism activities, such as guided nature walks and wildlife watching, can provide visitors with an opportunity to learn about the environment and the importance of conservation⁹². This can lead to increased awareness and support for environmental conservation efforts, both locally and globally. 

In conclusion, the study underscores the necessity of continuous monitoring and evaluation for ecotourism projects to gauge effectiveness and identify areas for enhancement. Proficient monitoring and evaluation offer crucial data for managers and policymakers to adapt strategies, ensuring the sustainability of these projects. This research furnishes significant insights into ecotourism's impacts on sustainable development, accentuating the significance of prudent planning, community participation, environmental education, and persistent monitoring and evaluation. By addressing these imperatives, ecotourism can be cultivated and administered in a manner that optimally harnesses its potential to advance sustainable development goals.

Based on an extensive review of the academic literature on ecotourism, several concise policy recommendations can be proposed for sustainable ecotourism development. Firstly, effective visitor management policies should be implemented, including measures such as setting visitor limits, implementing permit systems, and providing comprehensive environmental education programs for tourists⁹⁴. These measures can prevent overcrowding, mitigate negative impacts on natural ecosystems, and ensure a high-quality experience for visitors. Secondly, sustainable waste management practices should be prioritized, including waste reduction, recycling, and proper disposal. This can prevent pollution of local ecosystems and preserve the pristine nature of the destination. Additionally, promoting renewable energy sources, such as solar or wind power, can significantly reduce the carbon footprint of the destination, contributing to its long-term sustainability⁹⁵. Thirdly, community-based tourism should be encouraged, where local communities are actively involved in decision-making, planning, and benefit-sharing⁹⁶. This can ensure that local communities are engaged as active stakeholders in the tourism development process and receive equitable economic benefits. It can also foster a sense of ownership and stewardship among local communities towards the natural and cultural resources of the destination. Lastly, policies should promote cultural sensitivity among tourists, including respecting local customs, traditions, and beliefs⁹⁷. This can prevent cultural exploitation and ensure that the local heritage is preserved for future generations. Collaborative efforts between local communities, tourism operators, and policymakers can be made to safeguard and promote local cultural heritage. In conclusion, policy recommendations for sustainable ecotourism development should prioritize visitor management, sustainable waste management, community-based tourism, and cultural sensitivity. These interventions can ensure the long-term sustainability of ecotourism destinations, foster community benefits, and preserve natural and cultural resources for the benefit of present and future generations. Implementing these policies requires collaborative efforts among governments, destination managers, and local communities to promote responsible and sustainable ecotourism practices.

Ecotourism: Driving Sustainable Development

Ecotourism can be developed and managed in a way that maximizes its potential to promote sustainable development through careful planning, responsible practices, and community involvement⁹⁸. Here are some key principles and strategies:

Ecosystem Conservation: The protection and conservation of the natural environment should be the primary focus of ecotourism⁹⁹. This includes preserving biodiversity, minimizing negative environmental impacts, and promoting sustainable resource management.

Community Engagement: Local involvement in decision-making fosters economic and social gains from ecotourism. Collaborative engagement cultivates partnerships, deepens cultural comprehension, and ensures equitable distribution of tourism benefits^100-101.

Capacity Building: Investing in training and education programs for local communities, tour operators, and guides can improve their skills, knowledge, and understanding of sustainable practices. This empowers them to actively participate in ecotourism activities and make informed decisions^101-102.

Sustainable Infrastructure: Developing infrastructure in ecotourism areas should prioritize sustainability. This includes using eco-friendly construction materials, employing renewable energy sources, implementing waste management systems, and minimizing water consumption^103-105.

Responsible Visitor Management: Implementing visitor management plans helps control visitor numbers and behavior to minimize negative impacts on the environment and local communities. This may include setting carrying capacities, promoting responsible tourism practices, and providing environmental education to visitors¹⁰⁶.

Monitoring and Evaluation: Regular monitoring and evaluation of ecotourism operations are crucial to assess their impacts and effectiveness. This helps identify areas for improvement and adapt management strategies accordingly^107-108.

Partnerships and Collaboration: Collaboration among various stakeholders, such as government bodies, local communities, NGOs, and businesses, is essential for successful ecotourism development. Joint efforts can lead to shared responsibility, pooled resources, and coordinated actions^109-111.

Marketing and Awareness: Effective marketing strategies can promote ecotourism destinations and raise awareness about their sustainable practices. Highlighting the unique natural and cultural features of the area and the positive impacts of tourism can attract environmentally conscious travellers ^99,112.

Certification and Standards: Encouraging ecotourism operators to obtain certification from recognized organizations can ensure adherence to sustainable practices. Certifications like Global Sustainable Tourism Council (GSTC) help establish credibility and guide operators in meeting international standards¹¹³.

Research and Innovation: Encouraging research and innovation in ecotourism can lead to the development of new sustainable practices and technologies^114-116. Investing in research initiatives can help address emerging challenges and create more sustainable tourism models¹¹⁷.

With the implementation of above principles and strategies, ecotourism can contribute to sustainable development by preserving natural resources, protecting biodiversity, promoting community well-being, and creating economic opportunities that are in harmony with the environment.

Future Research Direction

While this study provides valuable insights into the impacts of ecotourism on sustainable development, there are several areas that require further research. One important area is the assessment of the long-term impacts of ecotourism on the environment, economy, and society. Long-term monitoring of ecotourism activities can provide valuable information on the effectiveness of current management strategies and the identification of new approaches to enhance sustainable development¹¹⁸. 

An avenue for future research lies in exploring the social and cultural ramifications of ecotourism on indigenous communities. While ecotourism offers economic advantages, it also triggers social and cultural shifts with mixed effects. Extensive investigation is essential to grasp these dynamics and devise measures for optimizing positive outcomes and mitigating negative ones³⁶.

Additionally, future research should focus on the integration of technology into ecotourism activities to enhance sustainable development. The use of technology, such as virtual reality and augmented reality, can provide visitors with an immersive and interactive experience that promotes environmental education and conservation awareness^119-122. Furthermore, the use of technology can enhance the monitoring and management of ecotourism activities, leading to more effective strategies for sustainable development. 

Finally, more research is needed on the impacts of ecotourism on indigenous communities and their rights. Ecotourism can have significant impacts on indigenous communities, including the loss of land and cultural heritage and the commodification of their culture. Further research is needed to understand the impacts of ecotourism on indigenous communities and to identify strategies to promote their rights and cultural preservation¹²³. In conclusion, future research should focus on the long-term impacts of ecotourism, the social and cultural impacts on local communities, the integration of technology, and the impacts on indigenous communities and their rights. Further research in these areas can enhance our understanding of the impacts of ecotourism on sustainable development and provide valuable insights for the development of effective management strategies.

Conclusion and Limitations

Since the emergence of sustainable development in the late 1980s, the contrast between conservation and it has been the subject of various discussions. Many projects to address the issue have gained traction in recent years, such as ecotourism, a type of tourism that takes place in natural regions, supports local communities, and includes a learning experience. Despite appearing to be the ideal tool for strengthening the link between conservation and sustainable development, ecotourism has numerous problems. This research aims to assess ecotourism's sustainability impact and propose mitigation methods. Findings reveal dual environmental, economic, and societal effects, which can be managed via planning, community engagement, and environmental education. These outcomes hold significance for global ecotourism project development and management.

One of the limitation of this research is that the literature review was limited to academic articles, books, and reports. Other sources such as interviews and surveys could provide further insight into the impact of ecotourism. Furthermore, the case studies analyzed were limited to a few regions and may not be representative of ecotourism projects in other parts of the world. Future research could expand the scope of the study to include a wider range of case studies from different regions.

Furthermore, the study only focused on the impacts of ecotourism on sustainable development and did not consider the impacts of other forms of tourism. It would be interesting to compare the impacts of ecotourism with those of mass tourism or adventure tourism to provide a more comprehensive picture of the tourism industry's impact on sustainable development.

Finally, the study did not analyze the economic feasibility of ecotourism projects, which is an important aspect to consider in the development and management of these projects. Future research could explore the economic impacts of ecotourism in more detail.

The research demonstrates how ecotourism may become a catalyst by serving as a learning tool for people of all ages, as well as for locals and visitors, through an analysis of stakeholders' viewpoints. Many issues, however, continue to impede ecotourism from attaining its full potential in terms of improving the link between conservation and sustainable development.

Despite these limitations, this research contributes to the understanding of the impacts of ecotourism on sustainable development and provides insights into strategies to mitigate its negative impacts. By addressing these issues, ecotourism can be developed and managed in a way that maximizes its potential to promote sustainable development.

Funding/ Acknowledgement: 

This research paper is a part of the research Program (funded by ICSSR, Ministry of Education, Government of India) entitled "Eco Tourism: A Panacea for Sustainable Development in Himachal Pradesh" File No. Gen-04/2021-22/ICSSR/RP dated 04/March/2022 of the Indian Council of Social Science Research, New Delhi. 

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

References 

1. Scheyvens R, Momsen JH. Tourism and poverty reduction: Issues for small island states. Tourism geographies. 2008;10(1):22-41.
2. Haseeb M, Azam M. Dynamic nexus among tourism, corruption, democracy and environmental degradation: a panel data investigation. Environment, development and sustainability. 2021;23(4):5557-75.
3. Moneva JM, Bonilla-Priego MJ, Ortas E. Corporate social responsibility and organisational performance in the tourism sector. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2020;28(6):853-72.
4. Streimikiene D, Svagzdiene B, Jasinskas E, Simanavicius A. Sustainable tourism development and competitiveness: The systematic literature review. Sustainable development. 2021;29(1):259-71.
5. Weaver DB. Ecotourism in the context of other tourism types.  The encyclopedia of ecotourism: CABI Publishing Wallingford UK; 2001. p. 73-83.
6. Honey M. Ecotourism and sustainable development. Who owns paradise?: Island press; 1999.
7. Bulatovi? J, Rajovi? G. Some Aspects of Eco Tourism with View to Montenegro: Overview. Journal of Advocacy, Research and Education. 2017(4):96-111.
8. Blamey RK. Principles of ecotourism.  The encyclopedia of ecotourism: Cabi Publishing Wallingford UK; 2001. p. 5-22.
9. McClurg CG. The international year of ecotourism: the celebration of a new form of colonialism. McGeorge L Rev. 2002;34:97.
10. Rivera JPR, Gutierrez ELM. A framework toward sustainable ecotourism value chain in the Philippines. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism. 2019;20(2):123-42.
11. Sobhani P, Esmaeilzadeh H, Sadeghi SMM, Marcu MV. Estimation of Ecotourism Carrying Capacity for Sustainable Development of Protected Areas in Iran. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(3):1059.
12. Duong NTH, Chi NK, Nguyen HT, Nguyen NTK, Nguyen CP, Nguyen UTT. WTPP for ecotourism: the impact of intention, perceived value, and materialism. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights. 2022;5(5):1034-45.
13. Sahahiri RM, Griffin AL, Sun Q. Investigating Ecotourism Opportunities Measurements in a Complex Adaptive System: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability. 2023;15(3):2678.
14. Kiper T. Role of ecotourism in sustainable development. InTech; 2013.
15. Chirenje LI. Contribution of ecotourism to poverty alleviation in Nyanga, Zimbabwe. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment. 2017;15(2):87-92.
16. Singh S, Dash TR, Vashko I. Tourism, ecotourism and sport tourism: the framework for certification. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. 2016;34(2):236-55.
17. Gurung DB, Seeland K. Ecotourism in Bhutan: Extending its benefits to rural communities. Annals of Tourism research. 2008;35(2):489-508.
18. Mondino E, Beery T. Ecotourism as a learning tool for sustainable development. The case of Monviso Transboundary Biosphere Reserve, Italy. Journal of Ecotourism. 2019;18(2):107-21.
19. Ramos AM, Prideaux B. Indigenous ecotourism in the Mayan rainforest of Palenque: empowerment issues in sustainable development. Journal of sustainable tourism. 2014;22(3):461-79.
20. Beall JM, Boley BB, Landon AC, Woosnam KM. What drives ecotourism: environmental values or symbolic conspicuous consumption? Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2021;29(8):1215-34.
21. Kunjuraman V, Hussin R, Aziz RC. Community-based ecotourism as a social transformation tool for rural community: A victory or a quagmire? Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism. 2022;39:100524.
22. Sánchez-Prieto MC, Luna-González A, Espinoza-Tenorio A, González-Ocampo HA. Planning ecotourism in coastal protected areas; projecting temporal management scenarios. Sustainability. 2021;13(14):7528.
23. Parker S, Khare A. Understanding success factors for ensuring sustainability in ecotourism development in southern Africa. Journal of ecotourism. 2005;4(1):32-46.
24. Yeboah T. Dynamics of ecotourism benefits distribution. Tourism Planning & Development. 2021:1-16.
25. Ma B, Yin R, Zheng J, Wen Y, Hou Y. Estimating the social and ecological impact of community-based ecotourism in giant panda habitats. Journal of environmental management. 2019;250:109506.
26. Boley BB, Green GT. Ecotourism and natural resource conservation: the ‘potential’for a sustainable symbiotic relationship. Journal of Ecotourism. 2016;15(1):36-50.
27. Zeppel H. Education and conservation benefits of marine wildlife tours: Developing free-choice learning experiences. The journal of environmental education. 2008;39(3):3-18.
28. Lo M-C, Mohamad AA, Songan P, Yeo AW. Positioning rural tourism: Perspectives from the local communities. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance. 2012;3(1):59.
29. Belsoy J, Korir J, Yego J. Environmental impacts of tourism in protected areas. Journal of Environment and Earth Science. 2012;2(10):64-73.
30. Radzi RM, Yaacob Z. Identifying Business Potential for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) Based on Developmental Plans in Penang, Malaysia. Journal of Technology Management and Business. 2022;9(2):34-50.
31. Moreno de la Santa JG-S. Tourism as a lever for a more inclusive society. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes. 2020;12(6):731-8.
32. Horton LR. Buying up nature: Economic and social impacts of Costa Rica's ecotourism boom. Latin American Perspectives. 2009;36(3):93-107.
33. Xu S, Hu Y. How do residents respond to negative environmental impacts from tourism? The role of community participation in empowering residents' environmentally responsible behavior. International Journal of Tourism Research. 2021;23(6):1099-111.
34. Akbar I, Myrzaliyeva ZK, Tazhekova AZ, Saulembayev AT, Kenzhebay RN. Evaluation of the community-based ecotourism development status in the Aksu-Jabagly nature reserve, Kazakhstan. Geo Journal of Tourism and Geosites. 2021;35(2):381-9.
35. Alfitri, Alfatih A, Lionardo A, Kholek A, Saraswati E, Izzudin M, et al. The complexity of integrating indigenous knowledge for ecotourism planning: a case of Mude Ayek's customary forests, Indonesia. International Journal of Tourism Anthropology. 2022;9(1):76-97.
36. Butarbutar R, Soemarno S. Environmental effects of ecotourism in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Tourism and Development Studies. 2013;1(3):97-107.
37. Shannon G, Larson CL, Reed SE, Crooks KR, Angeloni LM. Ecological consequences of ecotourism for wildlife populations and communities. Ecotourism’s promise and peril: A biological evaluation. 2017:29-46.
38. Godfrey J, Wearing SL, Schulenkorf N, Grabowski S. The ‘volunteer tourist gaze’: commercial volunteer tourists’ interactions with, and perceptions of, the host community in Cusco, Peru. Current Issues in Tourism. 2020;23(20):2555-71.
39. Donohoe HM. Defining culturally sensitive ecotourism: a Delphi consensus. Current Issues in tourism. 2011;14(1):27-45.
40.  Walter P. Local knowledge and adult learning in environmental adult education: Community?based ecotourism in southern Thailand. International Journal of lifelong education. 2009;28(4):513-32.
41.  Jamal T, Dredge D. Tourism and community development issues. R Sharpley and D Telfer, Tourism and Development Concepts and Issues, Second Edition London: Channel View. 2014:178-204.
42. Baloch QB, Shah SN, Iqbal N, Sheeraz M, Asadullah M, Mahar S, et al. Impact of tourism development upon environmental sustainability: A suggested framework for sustainable ecotourism. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2023;30(3):5917-30.
43. Ali Q, Yaseen MR, Anwar S, Makhdum MSA, Khan MTI. The impact of tourism, renewable energy, and economic growth on ecological footprint and natural resources: A panel data analysis. Resources Policy. 2021;74:102365.
44. Leposa N. Problematic blue growth: A thematic synthesis of social sustainability problems related to growth in the marine and coastal tourism. Sustainability Science. 2020;15:1233-44.
45. Harbor LC, Hunt CA. Indigenous tourism and cultural justice in a Tz’utujil Maya community, Guatemala. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2021;29(2-3):214-33.
46. Choi YE, Oh C-O, Chon J. Applying the resilience principles for sustainable ecotourism development: A case study of the Nakdong Estuary, South Korea. Tourism Management. 2021;83:104237.
47. Zoysa MD. Forest-based ecotourism in Sri Lanka: a review on state of governance, livelihoods, and forest conservation outcomes. Journal of Sustainable Forestry. 2022;41(3-5):413-39.
48. Omarzadeh D, Pourmoradian S, Feizizadeh B, Khallaghi H, Sharifi A, Kamran KV. A GIS-based multiple ecotourism sustainability assessment of West Azerbaijan province, Iran. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 2022;65(3):490-513.
49. Battaglini L, Bovolenta S, Gusmeroli F, Salvador S, Sturaro E. Environmental sustainability of Alpine livestock farms. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2014;13(2):3155.
50. Becken S, Schellhorn M. Ecotourism, energy use, and the global climate: Widening the local perspective.  Critical issues in ecotourism: Understanding a complex tourism phenomenon: Routledge; 2007. p. 85-101.
51. Farrell TA, Marion JL. Identifying and assessing ecotourism visitor impacts at eight protected areas in Costa Rica and Belize. Environmental conservation. 2001;28(3):215-25.
52. Dube K, Nhamo G. Greenhouse gas emissions and sustainability in Victoria Falls: Focus on hotels, tour operators and related attractions. African Geographical Review. 2021;40(2):125-40.
53. Bunruamkaew K, Murayama Y. Land use and natural resources planning for sustainable ecotourism using GIS in Surat Thani, Thailand. Sustainability. 2012;4(3):412-29.
54. Fetene A, Bekele T, Tiwari G. The contribution of ecotourism for sustainable livelihood around Nech Sar National Park, Ethiopia. Int J Environ Sci. 2012;1:19-25.
55. Sanchez RV. Conservation strategies, protected areas, and ecotourism in Costa Rica. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 2018;36(3):115-28.
56. Yokubovna YH. Evaluation of the economic impact of local population in the development of regional economy: ?n example of Chadak village. American Journal of Economics and Business Management. 2019;2(3):83-93.
57.  Makindi SM. Local communities, biodiversity conservation and ecotourism: acase study of the Kimana Community Wildlife Sanctuary, Kenya. 2016.
58. Kirkby CA, Giudice-Granados R, Day B, Turner K, Velarde-Andrade LM, Dueñas-Dueñas A, et al. The market triumph of ecotourism: an economic investigation of the private and social benefits of competing land uses in the Peruvian Amazon. PloS one. 2010;5(9):e13015.
59. Little ME, Blau E. Social adaptation and climate mitigation through agrotourism: a case study of tourism in Mastatal, Costa Rica. Journal of Ecotourism. 2020;19(2):97-112.
60. Mulyani S, Ahsani RDP, Wijaya DN. Collaborative Governance on Ecotourism: Towards Sustainable Tourism Development. Jurnal Borneo Administrator. 2021;17(3):319-34.
61. Khanal BR, Babar JT. Community based ecotourism for sustainable tourism development in the Mekong region. Policy Brief. 2007;1:2007.
62. Wearing S, Neil J. Ecotourism: Impacts, potentials and possibilities?: Routledge; 2009.
63. Ma X, Wang R, Dai M, Ou Y. The influence of culture on the sustainable livelihoods of households in rural tourism destinations. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2021;29(8):1235-52.
64. Islam F, Carlsen J. Indigenous communities, tourism development and extreme poverty alleviation in rural Bangladesh. Tourism Economics. 2016;22(3):645-54.
65. Laverack G, Thangphet S. Building community capacity for locally managed ecotourism in Northern Thailand. Community Development Journal. 2009;44(2):172-85.
66. Thabrew L, Wiek A, Ries R. Environmental decision making in multi-stakeholder contexts: applicability of life cycle thinking in development planning and implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2009;17(1):67-
67. Zhang Y, Xiong Y, Lee TJ, Ye M, Nunkoo R. Sociocultural sustainability and the formation of social capital from community-based tourism. Journal of Travel Research. 2021;60(3):656-69.
68. Garrod B. Local participation in the planning and management of ecotourism: A revised model approach. Journal of Ecotourism. 2003;2(1):33-53.
69. Buchsbaum BD. Ecotourism and sustainable development in Costa Rica. 2004.
70. Gezon LL. Who wins and who loses? Unpacking the “local people” concept in ecotourism: a longitudinal study of community equity in Ankarana, Madagascar. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2014;22(5):821-38.
71. GhulamRabbany M, Afrin S, Rahman A, Islam F, Hoque F. Environmental effects of tourism. American Journal of Environment, Energy and Power Research. 2013;1(7):117-30.
72. Løvschal M, Gravesen ML. De-/fencing grasslands: Ongoing boundary making and unmaking in postcolonial Kenya. Land. 2021;10(8):786.
73. Lee WH, Moscardo G. Understanding the impact of ecotourism resort experiences on tourists’ environmental attitudes and behavioural intentions. Journal of sustainable tourism. 2005;13(6):546-65.
74. Conti A. Eco hotels of the world: Eco Hotels of the World; 2008.
75.  Jones M. Sustainable event management: A practical guide: Routledge; 2014.
76. Birtles A, Valentine P, Curnock M, Arnold P, Dunstan A. Incorporating visitor experiences into ecologically sustainable dwarf minke whale tourism in the northern Great Barrier Reef. CRC Reef Research Centre Technical Report. 2002;42:1-65.
77. Satarat N. Sustainable management of community-based tourism in Thailand. Bangkok: School of Public Administration, National Institute of Development Administration. 2010.
78. Matarrita-Cascante D, Brennan MA, Luloff A. Community agency and sustainable tourism development: The case of La Fortuna, Costa Rica. Journal of sustainable tourism. 2010;18(6):735-56.
79. Surmeier A. Dynamic capability building and social upgrading in tourism-Potentials and limits of sustainability standards. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2020;28(10):1498-518.
80. Dodds R, Ali A, Galaski K. Mobilizing knowledge: Determining key elements for success and pitfalls in developing community-based tourism. Current Issues in Tourism. 2018;21(13):1547-68.
81. Ávila-Foucat VS, Revollo-Fernández D, Navarrete C. Determinants of Livelihood Diversification: The Case of Community-Based Ecotourism in Oaxaca, Mexico. Sustainability. 2021;13(20):11371.
82. Purnamawati IGA, Jie F, Hatane SE. Cultural change shapes the sustainable development of religious ecotourism villages in Bali, Indonesia. Sustainability. 2022;14(12):7368.
83. Govender IG, Giampiccoli A. Towards university involvement in community-based tourism monitoring & evaluation education. e-Review of Tourism Research. 2020;18(2):252-68.
84. Koval V, Mikhno I, Udovychenko I, Gordiichuk Y, Kalina I. Sustainable natural resource management to ensure strategic environmental development. TEM Journal. 2021;10(3):1022.
85. Govender IG, Giampiccoli A. Imperatives for monitoring and evaluation of community-based tourism: A higher education institutions perspective. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure. 2018;7(2):1-16.
86. Kusters K, Buck L, de Graaf M, Minang P, van Oosten C, Zagt R. Participatory planning, monitoring and evaluation of multi-stakeholder platforms in integrated landscape initiatives. Environmental management. 2018;62(1):170-81.
87. Taplin J, Dredge D, Scherrer P. Monitoring and evaluating volunteer tourism: A review and analytical framework. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2014;22(6):874-97.
88. Vincent ML. Crowdsourced data for cultural heritage. Heritage and Archaeology in the Digital Age: Acquisition, Curation, and Dissemination of Spatial Cultural Heritage Data. 2017:79-91.
89. Mgonja JT, Sirima A, Mkumbo PJ. A review of ecotourism in Tanzania: Magnitude, challenges, and prospects for sustainability. Journal of Ecotourism. 2015;14(2-3):264-77.
90. Clifton J, Benson A. Planning for sustainable ecotourism: The case for research ecotourism in developing country destinations. Journal of sustainable tourism. 2006;14(3):238-54.
91. Setini M, Wardana I, Sukaatmadja I, Ekawati N, Yasa N, Astawa I. Policy models for improving ecotourism performance to build quality tourism experience and sustainable tourism. Management Science Letters. 2021;11(2):595-608.
92. Sangpikul A. Tourist perceptions of guided ecotourism tours in Thailand. Tourism and hospitality research. 2020;20(2):245-56.
93. Pasape L, Anderson W, Lindi G. Good governance strategies for sustainable ecotourism in Tanzania. Journal of Ecotourism. 2015;14(2-3):145-65.
94. Leung Y-F, Spenceley A, Hvenegaard G, Buckley R, Groves C. Tourism and visitor management in protected areas: Guidelines for sustainability: IUCN Gland, Switzerland; 2018.
95. Raihan A. Toward sustainable and green development in Chile: dynamic influences of carbon emission reduction variables. Innovation and Green Development. 2023;2(2):100038.
96. Parks L. Benefit-sharing in environmental governance: Local experiences of a global concept: Routledge; 2019.
97. Ghaderi Z, Hall CM, Scott N, Béal L. Islamic beliefs and host-guest relationships in Iran. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2020;90:102603.
98. Koliouska, C., & Andreopoulou, Z. (2023). E-Tourism for Sustainable Development through Alternative Tourism Activities. Sustainability, 15(11), 8485.
99. Samal, R., & Dash, M. (2022). Ecotourism, biodiversity conservation, and local livelihoods: Understanding the convergence and divergence. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks.
100. Cabral, C., & Dhar, R. L. (2020). Ecotourism research in India: From an integrative literature review to a future research framework. Journal of ecotourism, 19(1), 23-49.
101. Pujar, S. C., & Mishra, N. (2021). Ecotourism industry in India: a review of current practices and prospects. Anatolia, 32(2), 289-302.
102. Mago, Y. M. F. (2011). Community capacity building for ecotourism: a literature review. In 2011 Conference Proceedings Conference Proceedings (p. 185).
103. Subramaniam, P. (2008). Outlook for ecotourism in India. International Forestry Review, 10(2), 245-255.
104. Picard, D. (2015). Making ecotourism sustainable: refocusing on economic viability. Lessons learnt from the “Regional strategic action plan for coastal ecotourism development in the South Western Indian Ocean”. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(6), 819-837.
105. Vasanthi, C., GK, P. K., & Shuba, A. C. (2018). Ecotourism–Innovative way for sustainable development. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 7(4S), 249-251.
106. Chandran, A. (2018). Visitor Management and Community Participation in an Ecotourism Destination: The Case of Kanha Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh, India. Evolving Paradigms in Tourism and Hospitality in Developing Countries, 57.
107. Ashok, S., Behera, M. D., & Tewari, H. R. (2019). Evaluating the applicability of ESM (Ecotourism Sustainability Maximization) model to assess, monitor, and manage the ecotourism sustainability in mountain ecosystem (Mt. Kangchendzonga Base Camp Trek, India). Environmental monitoring and assessment, 191, 1-21.
108. Govender, I. G., & Giampiccoli, A. (2018). Imperatives for monitoring and evaluation of community-based tourism: A higher education institutions perspective. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 7(2), 1-16.
109. Stone, M. T. (2015). Community-based ecotourism: A collaborative partnerships perspective. Journal of Ecotourism, 14(2-3), 166-184.
110. Romero-Brito, T. P., Buckley, R. C., & Byrne, J. (2016). NGO partnerships in using ecotourism for conservation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one, 11(11), e0166919.
111. Chandran, C., & Bhattacharya, P. (2022). Development and implementation of sustainability criteria and indicators for eco-lodges and resorts in ecotourism destinations: Case studies from India. Turizam, 26(3), 161-175.
112. Najar, A. H., Kour, P., & Jasrotia, A. Recovery marketing for conflict sensitive destination: Stakeholders perspective on tourism revival in Kashmir Valley (India). Conflict Resolution Quarterly.
113. Hafezi, F., Bijani, M., Gholamrezai, S., Savari, M., & Panzer-Krause, S. (2023). Towards sustainable community-based ecotourism: A qualitative content analysis. Science of The Total Environment, 164411.
114. Firman, A., Moslehpour, M., Qiu, R., Lin, P. K., Ismail, T., & Rahman, F. F. (2023). The impact of eco-innovation, ecotourism policy and social media on sustainable tourism development: evidence from the tourism sector of Indonesia. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(2), 2143847.
115. Kummitha, H. R. (2020). Stakeholders involvement towards sustaining ecotourism destinations: The case of social entrepreneurship at mangalajodi ecotourism trust in India. Geo Journal of Tourism and Geosites, 29(2), 636-648.
116. Bagri, S. C., Suresh Babu, A., & Bhatt, V. P. (2013). Innovation and Competitiveness in Ecotourism: A View from the Koti-Kanasar-Indroli-Patyur Circuit in Uttarakhand Himalaya, India. Journal of Tourism, 14(1).
117. Jain, R., & Thakkar, J. (2019). Experiencing craft and culture: An emerging cultural sustainable tourism model in India. In Cultural Sustainable Tourism: A Selection of Research Papers from IEREK Conference on Cultural Sustainable Tourism (CST), Greece 2017 (pp. 29-35). Springer International Publishing.
118. Bagus SI, Imade SU, Nyoman SIA, Putu WSN. Community based tourism as sustainable tourism support. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences. 2019;94(10):70-8.
119. Bec A, Moyle B, Schaffer V, Timms K. Virtual reality and mixed reality for second chance tourism. Tourism Management. 2021;83:104256.
120. Kumar S, Kumar V, Attri K. Impact of artificial intelligence and service robots in tourism and hospitality sector: current use & future trends. Administrative Development: A Journal of HIPA, Shimla. 2021;8:59-83.
121. Kumar S, Saini A, Kumar S, Kumar V. Bibliometric Analysis on Internet of Things (IoT) and Tourism Industry: A Study Based on Scopus Database. South Asian Journal of Tourism and Hospitality. 2022;2(1), 76–95.
122. Kumar, S., et al., Digital transformation in tourism sector: trends and future perspectives from a bibliometric-content analysis. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 2023. ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print).
123. Reimer JK, Walter P. How do you know it when you see it? Community-based ecotourism in the Cardamom Mountains of southwestern Cambodia. Tourism Management. 2013;34:122-32.