• google scholor
  • Views: 685

  • PDF Downloads: 0

Spatial Pattern of Covid-19 in Relation to Population Density: A Case Study in Assam (India)

Satyendra Hazarika * and Niha Dutta

1 Department of Geography, Darrang College, Tezpur, Assam India

Corresponding author Email: satyendrahazarika@gmail.com

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.17.3.22

Since the time of occurrence of first wave of COVID-19, its study from multi dimensional directions becomes visible across academic disciplines globally. In this paper we analyze the correlation between spread of corona virus and population density. The study is undertaken at district level in the state of Assam, (North-eastern India), considering the confirmed COVID-19 cases (during the first wave) and population density of the districts. We use the Karl Pearson’s correlation method for assessing the level of correlation, which is further tested with t-test application. A cartographic representation is also constructed using GIS platform to observe the COVID-19 spatial incidence in relation to population density pattern. We have observed that the number of infection and population density at district level have a positive relationship with R value 0.641, which can be considered statistically significant.

COVID-19; Pandemic; Population Density; Spatial Pattern

Copy the following to cite this article:

Hazarika S, Dutta N. Spatial Pattern of Covid-19 in Relation to Population Density: A Case Study in Assam (India). Curr World Environ 2022;17(3). DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CWE.17.3.22

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Hazarika S, Dutta N. Spatial Pattern of Covid-19 in Relation to Population Density: A Case Study in Assam (India). Curr World Environ 2022;17(3).


Download article (pdf)
Citation Manager
Publish History


Article Publishing History

Received: 2022-06-17
Accepted: 2022-09-23
Reviewed by: Orcid Orcid Jose Balsa
Second Review by: Orcid Orcid Mrinmoyee Naskar
Final Approval by: Dr. Rui Alexandre Marçal Dias Castanho

Introduction

COVID-19 is a global catastrophic pandemic that has destabilized the entire humanity during 2020-21 in terms of their life and livelihood. World Health Organization (henceforth WHO) is continuously working on various dimensions of COVID-19 issues including data collection to general health care and specific prevention including vaccination etc. By end of January 2020, 20 countries had reported COVID-19, that gone up to 54 in February, and 202 by end of March that further rises to 212 by April 2020. It thus quickly literally becomes a global health crisis, excluding Antarctic and few islands of the Pacific. In India where the third wave of COVID-19 is already pending, the country is battling with 25 million cases since the pandemic began. Thus, the country ranked the second highest confirmed infections cases after the United States of America.

According to a WHO global report, worldwide 243,857,028 confirmed COVID cases are detected (as on October 2021) that includes 4,953,246 deaths. India has 34,202,202 confirmed COVID cases (which are just about 14% of the global COVID cases) with 455,068 deaths, representing 9.2% of the global COVID deaths (WHO report). According to the latest updated global statistics total coronavirus cases is 599,283,402, that includes 6,467,402 death and 573,275,931 recovery (as on 19th August 2022).   

Another interesting observation is that places having high density like cities and metropolitan etc. have faster spread of the disease than places in isolation and lesser density.  Among the Indian states Maharashtra reported the highest confirmed COVID-19 cases of over 6.6 million cases, followed by Kerala and Karnataka (as on October 2021), where Assam stand at 17th position in terms of confirmed cases. The paper is a spatial analysis of district level COVID-19 pattern in state of Assam, India in relation to its district population density and affect per 10000 of population, where database during the first wave of the pandemic is taken into consideration for the necessary analysis.          

Relevant studies of COVID and population dynamics

At global level COVID-19 and population correlation is established by various researchers, considering various population related parameters like: density, urban population, economic status etc. In a district level study at Bangladesh a positive relationship value of R=0.876 is observed between COVID-19 spread and density pattern of population, which is high degree of relationship. (1)

The use of geospatial tools may also play critical role in understanding the various dimensions of COVID-19. Another study has (2020) demonstrated the relevance of geospatial analysis for effective decision making and addressing the critical issues related to spread of the disease over space and time. (2)

Carballada and Balsa-Barreiro (2021) demonstrated how the application of geospatial analysis to fine-grained data must be urgently adopted for optimal decision making in real and near-real time. (3) 

Another metropolitan level study has shown both direct and indirect impact of number per unit area on the COVID-19 infection and mortality rate for 913 metropolitan counties. The study found that metropolitan population is a significant predictor of infection rate. Larger metropolitan have higher infection and higher mortality. (4) 

Since the outbreak of COVID-19 as a global pandemic, its studies have been undertaken by academicians across disciplines. Some of the fields of studies are: genetics of the disease and its spatio-temporal mutation, medical emergencies out of the disease, various socio-economic, demographic and politico-cultural impacts assessment during and after the outbreak of the pandemic, lockdown impact in various dimensions like on health, education, economy, children psychology etc. The attempt in this paper is a demographic district level study of the initial COVID-19 outbreak in relation to population density in state of Assam, India. Some of the related studies are incorporated herewith that are undertaken at global and national level.

In Indian context, a study by Arif and Sengupta has explained how population density in a given unit of area affects the spread of the corona virus, its contact and subsequent diffusion. The study unfolded a positive relation between population density and the disease spread. They highlighted the study based on state level assessment in four south Indian states of Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Telengana . (5)

In places of high density and places where people live in close contact, there is a scope of higher spread of contagious diseases, including one like corona-virus. The study at district level have unfolded a moderately positive relation between the virus and the density of population structure of those districts. (6)

A select metropolitan level study in India between inhabitants against a given unit of area and its effects on transmission of corona virus have observed a strong correlation between both of them with R=0.842 (2021). (7) 

Population density is endorsed as a catalyst factor for the proliferation of COVID-19 in Algeria cities, where a strong correlation is observed between population density and spread of the virus (2020). (8) 

Study area: The study area covered in this paper is the state of Assam, India. The analysis is done at district level to investigate the correlation of district level population density and COVID cases. Figure-1 have indicated the outline map of the study area.

Figure 1: Location Map of Study Area   

 

Click here to view Figure 

Objectives

The main objectives of this research paper are as follows

To find out the COVID-19 affected zones in relation to population density pattern at district level, Assam. 

To find out COVID confirmed cases per 10,000 of district population, Assam.

To find out the correlation between population density and COVID confirmed cases. 

Research question:

Is population density in a possible key determinant of the risk of COVID-19 transmission? 

Methodology: As a district level analysis the paper tries to investigate the correlation of the confirmed COVID-19 cases (during 1st wave) and population density of the districts of Assam. For that secondary data base of population density (census, 2011) and COVID-19 confirmed cases from COVID-19 desk board, government of Assam is taken into consideration. Karl Pearson’s correlation method is used for the analysis of the relation, which is further tested with t-test application. A cartographic representation is also constructed using GIS platform to observe the COVID-19 zones in relation to population density pattern.

In addition to the ‘r’ analysis, there is also a projection of district-wise COVID-19 confirmed cases in Assam per 10,000 populations. It has been arranged in descending order and presented in form of a trend line.   

Figure: 2 The flow chart of the research methodology

 

Click here to view Figure 

Discussion and analysis

Within Assam the first confirmed case of the virus was detected on 31st March 2020 from Karimganj district. It was the 3rd confirmed case in North-East India after one case each from Manipur and Mizoram. Till 28th February, 2021 the Govt. of Assam has confirmed a total of 63,950 cases in which 18,670 are in active mode.  To date, with 70.58%, 45,138 patients have recovered and 167 deaths (0.26%) have been reported in Assam. 

District level COVID-19 zones

As indicated in table: 1 a district level COVID zoning is done as low, moderate and high , in relation to population density. Based on data a district-wise zones of confirmed cases till 28th February, 2021, is represented through choropleth map on GIS platform (Figure:3) in which Kamrup Metro district is considered as the hotspot for COVID-19 with 20,663 confirmed cases in Assam.  Along with Kamrup Metro, Nagaon, Jorhat, Dibrugarh, Tinsukia and Cachar districts are also fall under the category of high zone with more than 3000 cases in each district. These are also the district having highest population density zone (>800 person/ sqkm.).  On the other hand, Goalpara, Kokrajhar, Barpeta, Baksa, Chirang, Bongaigaon, Nalbari, Udalguri, Morigaon, Karbi-Anglong, Dima Hasao, Hailakandi, Karimganj, Sivasagar, Lakhimpur and Dhemaji districts come under the category of low COVID zone with less than 1500 cases, representing lowest population density zone (<400 person/ sqkm). The remaining districts falls under moderate category both in terms of COVID confirmed cases and population density, with cases in between 1500-3000 with density between 400-800 person/ sq km. 

The choropleth map is based on 2011 census data for which newly formed districts including Hojai, Biswanath Chariali, Majuli, Charaideo and West Karbi Anglong are not included here.    

Table 1: Zones of Covid Confirmed Cases and Population Density

ZONE

(Based on COVID Confirmed Cases)

DISTRICTS

DENSITY

DISTRICTS

Low

Goalpara, Kokrajhar, Barpeta, Baksa, Chirang, Bongaigaon, Nalbari, Udalguri, Morigaon, Karbi-Anglong, Dima Hasao, Hailakandi, Karimganj, Sivasagar, Lakhimpur and Dhemaji.

Low (Below 400)

Dima Hasao, Karbi Anglong, Kokrajhar, Sonitpur, Dhemaji, Tinsukia, Dibrrugarh, Jorhat, Golaghat, Chirang and Baksa.

Moderate

Dhubri, Kamrup Rural, Sonitpur, Golaghat and Darrang.

Moderate (400-800)

Goalpara, Barpeta, Morigaon, Nagaon, Lakhimpur, Sivasagar, Cachar, Karimganj, Hailakandi, Bangaigaon, Kamrup Rural, Nalbari, Darrang and Udalguri.

 

High

 

Kamrup Metro, Nagaon, Jorhat, Dibrugarh, Tinsukia and Cachar.

 

 

High (Above 800)

 

Kamrup Metro and Dhubri.

Source: COVID zones are based on COVID 19 Dashboard – Govt. of Assam (https://covid19.assam.gov.in/) (9)     

Population Density zones are based on Census Report, 2011. 

Figure 3: District-wise COVID-19 zones in relation to population density.

 

Click here to view Figure 

Among the various controlling factors that give direct or indirect inputs towards  daily rise of COVID cases, urban population and population density followed by availability of testing laboratories, doctors, other health workers, bed in public health centers, govt. hospitals, population below national poverty line, percentage of marginal workers and percentage of the elderly population etc. are the most prominent one.  Areas with higher number of people are expected to have more cases as population density is one of the most important promoting factors of COVID-19.  For this purpose, here an attempt is made to study about the interrelationship between population density and COVID cases in Assam.

Trend Analysis of COVID cases/ per 10,000 Population: Analysis of district-wise COVID-confirmed cases per 10,000 people of Assam is estimated as shown in table: 2. It has been arranged in descending order and projected through a trend line as indicated by figure: 4. The graph has clearly shown much higher cases/ per 10,000 people in Kamrup metro district (164.78/ per 10,000 people), which is also the highest district in terms of total confirmed cases. Rests of the district [i]are falling way behind at below 40/per 10,000 people.   

Table 2: District wise COVID-19 Confirmed Cases per 10000 People, Assam (as on oct. 2021)

Name of the districts

Total confirmed case

Total district population

COVID Cases /10000 People

Kamrup Metro

20663

1253938

164.78

Jorhat

3358

1092256

30.74

Dibrugarh

3927

1326335

29.61

Tinsukia

3366

1327929

25.35

Golaghat

2387

1066888

22.37

Hailakandi

1387

659296

21.04

Darrang

1907

928500

20.54

Kamrup (Rural)

2902

1517542

19.12

Cachar

3302

1736617

19.01

Bangaigaon

1113

738804

15.06

Nagaon

3895

2823768

13.79

Nalbari

948

771639

12.29

Sonitpur

2351

1924110

12.22

Lakhimpur

1266

1042137

12.15

Dima Hasao

237

214102

11.07

Udalguri

758

831668

9.11

Dhubri

1723

1949258

8.84

Karimganj

1025

1228686

8.34

Dhemaji

502

686133

7.32

Morigaon

638

957423

6.66

Barpeta

1121

1693622

6.62

Karbi Anglong

632

956313

6.61

Goalpara

658

1008183

6.53

Chirang

280

482162

5.81

Baksa

487

950075

5.13

Kokrajhar

408

887142

4.59

Sibsagar

529

1151050

4.59

Data Source: Confirmed COVID-19 Cases are based on COVID-19 Dashboard – Govt. of Assam

Total Population data is based on Census Report, 2011. (10)

Figure 4: District-wise confirmed COVID cases/ 10,000 population.

 

Click here to view Figure 

Calculation of Correlation: Based on district-wise population density and COVID confirmed cases, ‘r’ is calculated using Karl Pearson correlation, which is further, tested using t-test. The result is enlisted in table: 3 & table: 4 respectively.

Table 3: Correlation

 

 

Population Density

COVID Confirmed Cases

Population Density

Pearson Correlation

1

.641**

Sig. (2-tailed)

 

.000

N

27

27

COVID Confirmed Cases

Pearson Correlation

.641**

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

 

N

27

27

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

 

To show the relation between population density and COVID confirmed cases Karl Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient is calculated as it’s a statistical tool to examine the association between two variables as well as whether two variables are positively or negatively related and what is the intensity of their relationship.  From the table 3 it is cleared that there exist a positive correlation in between population density and COVID confirmed cases as the value of R is 0.641 which is in between 0.5 to 1.  However, without applying the t test isn’t feasible to generalize this positive relationship for all the districts. 

Table 4: Paired Samples t-Test.

 

 

Paired Differences

t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

 

 

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

95% Confidence Interval of the Difference

 

 

Lower

Upper

Pair 1

COVID confirmed cases - PopulationDensity

1.795E3

3695.848

711.266

332.860

3256.918

2.524

26

.018

 

Here, t value is highly positive and the p value is < .05 so, it is cleared that there is a relation between population density and COVID confirmed cases which is statistically significant also.  Thus, it may be concluded that this positive correlation is applicable for all the districts.

Figure 5: Scatter Plot of Population Density and COVID Confirmed Cases

 

Click here to view Figure 

Figure 5 shows that district of Kamrup Metro followed by Dibrugarh, Tinsukia, Jorhat, Cachar, Kamrup Rural, Golaghat, Sonitpur, Kokrajhar, Dhemaji, Chirang, Karbi Anglong and Dima Hasao fall above the fit line and rest are below the same. 

Findings

Based on the study it has been observed that Kamrup Metropolitan has the highest COVID cases, which is also the highest population density belt. It has also indicated the highest COVID affect/10000 population. Overall the state as a whole have a positive correlation between confirmed COVID cases and population density, which is moderately correlated with a ‘r’ value of .641. Some of the finding of the study is summarized in the following ways:

Till 28th February, 2021 the Govt. of Assam has confirmed 167 people succumbed to COVID, while with 70.58%, 45,138 patients have recovered out of 63,950 confirmed cases in which 18,670 are in still active mode.

Among the various controlling factors large population size (especially urban population) with high density plays a dominant role in raising daily mark of COVID cases in Assam.

The trend of COVID affect per 10000 people has indicated highest cases in Kamrup Metroploitan (164.78/ per 10,000 people), which is also the highest district in terms of total confirmed cases. Rests of the district are falling way behind at below 40/per 10,000 people.   

As per the Karl Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient there exist a positive relationship in between population density and COVID confirmed cases as the value of ‘r’ is 0.641 which is in between 0.5 to 1.  In this regard, with high population density Kamrup Metro district has become the hotspot for COVID-19 with 20,663 confirmed cases in Assam, with highest affect per 10,000 people.

Kamrup Metropolitan district followed by Dibrugarh, Tinsukia, Jorhat, Cachar, Kamrup Rural, Golaghat, Sonitpur, Kokrajhar, Dhemaji, Chirang, Karbi Anglong and Dima Hasao fall above the line of best fit and rest are below the same. 

Acknowledgement

Myself Dr. Satyendra Hazarika the first author of the paper have acknowledged the help of my co-author in executing my concept, especially in the making of the GIS map of the theme.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest in the completion of the work.

Funding Sources

The authors haven’t received any financial support for the publication of the research article.

References 

  1. Alam, M.Z., Is population density a risk factor for communicable diseases like COVID-19-a case of Bangladesh, Asia pacific Journal of Public Health, 2021
  2. Pardo E. F., Billa L., Spatial Analysis and GIS in the study of COVID-19: a review, Science Direct, 2020, volume 739, 
  3. Carballada and Balsa-B., Geospatial Analysis and Mapping Strategies for Fine-Grained and Detailed COVID-19 Data, with GIS, https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/10/9/602. 2021  
  4. Hamidi S., Sabouri S., Ewing R., Does Density Aggravate the COVID-19 Pandemic?, Journal of American Planning Association, 2020, vol.86, No.4, p1
  5. Arif M., Sengupta S., Nexus between population density and novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in the south Indian states: A geo-statistical approach, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2021, 23 (7), 10246-10274
  6. Bhadra A., Mukherjee A, Sarkar K., Impact of population density on Covid-19 infected and mortality rate in India, Modelling Earth Systems and Environment, 2021, 7(1), 623-629
  7. Dwivedi S., Misra S., Agnihotri R., Kumar V., Sharma P, Sinam G., Pandey V., Environmental Disease, vol.06, issue:04, 2021 
  8. Kadi N., Khelfaoui M., Population density, a factor in the spread of COVID-19 in Algeria: A statistical study, Bulletin of Health the National Research Centre, 2020
  9. Covid-19 database of Assam, https://covid19.assam.gov.in/
  10. District Census Handbook, Assam 2011
  11. WHO Coronavirus (Covid-19) dashboard, https://covid19.who.int